Threaded View
-
28-11-2014 #1
Following a brief mention by Jazz in a different thread, I had a look at the CS-Labs website where they say that the CSMIO/IP-M now has slave axis functionality. They also say that it does not include full gantry geometry correction (which the CSMIO/IP-S does do, at about 2.5x the price!). I have mailed them to see if there is any more information available, but this looks like an important enough development that it deserves a thread of its own.
My new machine has reached the point where I am thinking about an external motion control card, as well as alternating on a more-or-less daily basis about whether to go single motor/twin belts or two motors for X. Even if I go single-motor now, I don't want to get a motion controller that stops me going 2-motor at a later date if I feel it necessary. If I were happy with single motor then the IP-M would be my choice, but if it is single-motor only, I might look at alternatives (ESS maybe? Does that do slave axis homing properly now? Pure Logic PLCM-something?). This new development might solve the problem - IP-M can do both, has 24V operation for good noise immunity, decent opto-isolation and other nice features including spindle speed control on the same board. I'm guessing that there are others out there in a similar position, or at least thinking about upgrading to an external motion controller.
I've had a look at the IP-S manual to try to second-guess what the lack of gantry geometry correction might mean. As I understand it, the IP-S can do a calibration run where it homes both axes, measures the offset between home switches, and builds this into the configuration parameters. The user can then tweak the offset value to fine-tune for squareness, etc. Maybe the IP-M will lack this calibration capability, which means manual adjustment of home switches? Don't know - but would like to! It looks as if the IP-M manual available online hasn't been updated with this new functionality yet.
I shall post any more information received from CS directly, but would like to hear any other comments or information or especially experience of playing with it in this mode!
-
The Following User Says Thank You to Neale For This Useful Post:
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
ES-D1008 + CSMIO/IP-S wiring
By Matt81 in forum CS-Lab (CSMIO)Replies: 3Last Post: 03-05-2014, 10:56 PM -
Home Switches & Slave Axis in Mach 3
By Tenson in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)Replies: 14Last Post: 03-03-2014, 11:43 PM -
CSMIO/IP-M vs Ethernet SmoothStepper (Begone foul parallel port!)
By Greeny in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 20Last Post: 14-11-2013, 11:59 PM -
NEW MEMBER: Goal - Enable 3-Axis CNC Bed Mill to Perform 5-Axis Milling
By LoveLearn in forum New Member IntroductionsReplies: 2Last Post: 25-01-2012, 08:46 PM -
Precision metal processing (3 axis, 5 axis, 7 axis) OEM
By 7AxisCNC in forum Manufacturer NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 17-05-2011, 02:04 PM
Bookmarks