. .

Thread: G53 movement

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    I just tried it with Mach3 and it works either way round. I only tried with G0
    Spelling mistakes are not intentional, I only seem to see them some time after I've posted

  2. #2
    I think that it comes down to whatever the motion control software accepts! However, it does seem that gcode is a bit flexible about this kind of thing. For example, you can put the coordinates in in any order, and I have a feeling that the G53 can be anywhere on the line. From memory, I think I use G0 G53 X~ Y~ because that seems logical to me, but I don't think it matters. That's all true for Mach3 and LinuxCNC, anyway, but some of the proprietary motion control systems might have their own interpretation.

  3. #3
    Thanks both, I'll try my program the other way round and see if it makes any difference.

    There are other things at play, so this might be a red herring.

    Adrian.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. axis movement jamming
    By Skydeals in forum Linear & Rotary Motion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 18-12-2014, 10:27 AM
  2. funny movement on solidcam turning
    By eamo1978 in forum Solidworks
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 23-06-2014, 08:16 AM
  3. Z axis assembly - unsupported rail for very limited movement
    By dsc in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-10-2012, 12:44 PM
  4. Motors, pulleys & movement - not strictly CNC related...
    By Rogue in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 20-09-2011, 11:05 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •