Threaded View
-
27-03-2015 #16
Correct But Why anyone would expect a £130 Control software using windows parallel port to be industrial strength is beyond me if I'm honest.!! . . . . Your simply being unrealistic in your expectations.!
Now while Mach was never intended for industrial control that was using the Parallel port.!! Windows and parallel port we all know are rubbish for anything but simple hobby use but Mach works like a Charm with a Quality Motion control Card Like Cslabs or Kflop, Galil etc
Without getting into the Linux vs Mach rubbish both softwares do a great job for very little to No money in Linux case and when correctly matched with Hardware can give some of the very very expensive industrial controls a very good run for there money but unfortunatly all to often People are too quick to fire and blame the software. Often it really is case of " Poor workman blaming is tools". .!!Last edited by JAZZCNC; 27-03-2015 at 03:14 PM.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Bridgeport VMC with Heidenhain control-
By vargai in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 3Last Post: 13-01-2015, 02:37 PM -
Bridgeport with crusader i control
By daff in forum Bridgeport Milling MachinesReplies: 0Last Post: 10-09-2014, 09:04 PM -
CNC Motion control
By StoneyCNC in forum Manufacturer NewsReplies: 1Last Post: 26-08-2013, 10:07 AM -
Time for a purpose built motion control computer.
By GeoffV in forum General ComputingReplies: 17Last Post: 08-11-2010, 01:11 AM -
Motion Control drivers and motors
By bruce_miranda in forum Motor Drivers & ControllersReplies: 71Last Post: 27-08-2009, 09:40 AM
Bookmarks