Connecting to a CNC machine, pros and cons of USB vs PP vs Ethernet etc.

[JAZZCNC]

The danger of relying on experience in this way that find yourself reaching conclusions that your experience does not - and cannot - support. To put it another way; lifting 6 tonnes on rope specified for a safe working load of 1 tonne is a bad idea, even if you've 'done it before lots of times'. In fact, it's increasingly poor idea even as you gain more 'experience' that the rope you're using is 'much stronger than the spec sheet said'.


Why I'm objecting is that, whilst you have a lot of experience, 'Ethernet is much better than USB for Motion control' isn't a statement of your experience - you've extrapolated it into conjecture. You can tell it's not experience, because the existence of even one solid USB motion controller is sufficient to falsify your claim.

Stop talking Bollocks your twisting things to fit.!! . . . . . Object all you like but end of the day we are talking MOTION CONTROL not Networking etc. I can honestly tell you with Hand on Heart I've never had a Machine stop or Dropout thru Ethernet failing on Any Motion control device I've used and I've used most of those in the Serious Hobby user market and some of the more expensive ones as well.
Like wise I've had many many experiences thru helping others and costly experiences of my own thru lost material and time with USB driven Motion control cards or devices dropping out on Both Box PC's and Laptops. So I must object because My experience is very wide so therefore Valid and very much relavant to CNC MOTION CONTROL.!! . . . . Which is what we are talking about here.!!

No more will say on this because as Said it detracts from OP problem.!!

[Jess]

I must object because My experience is very wide so therefore Valid and very much relavant to CNC MOTION CONTROL.!! . . . . Which is what we are talking about here.!!

Experience has limitations. You almost seem recognise this when you say 'we are talking MOTION CONTROL not Networking etc.' but in falling over yourself to claim limits to the experience of others, you're forgetting applying it to your own.

It's much derided, but theory is necessary to understand what the limitations of one's experience are; ie., the situations it's useful in, and the claims that that experience allows one to make. It allows one to look at what is going on, rather than be confused by a name. For instance, you can fixate on it being called 'motion control', or you can recognise it being called Ethernet is a pretty big hint - ie., that it's a networking technology for, well, networking things and that it doesn't much care if the device you've plugged in is a desktop running a web browser, a VoIP phone or a motion controller.

Simply put - having used some motion controls doesn't qualify you to say that USB is the problem. For instance, given that USB controls tend to be in the lower end of the market whilst Ethernet motion controls tend to be at least 'serious hobby' - so an alternative conclusion would be that USB motion controls tend to be cheap with performance to match - nothing to do with the cable you used to connect it to your PC.

This difference is important, because if USB is the problem, an ethernet motion controller for side-hobby money is a great deal; if the issue is instead that it's simply unreasonable to expect a decent motion controller to be cheap, then one should be wary of any motion controller for less than serious hobby money.

No more will say on this because as Said it detracts from OP problem.!!

The only reason why I'm even talking about Ethernet is that you brought it up. The only reason I'm still talking about it, is because I'm replying to you.

The majority of my post was, in fact on OP's problem. None of yours was.

To try to get it back on track again, if the USB motion controller is likely to be a problem, could it even be the root of the present issue - as in, something goes wrong (eg., command buffer empties during a run) and the controller goes into e-stop mode? (And that guard switch is sorted?)

[JAZZCNC]

Simply put - having used some motion controls doesn't qualify you to say that USB is the problem. For instance, given that USB controls tend to be in the lower end of the market whilst Ethernet motion controls tend to be at least 'serious hobby' - so an alternative conclusion would be that USB motion controls tend to be cheap with performance to match - nothing to do with the cable you used to connect it to your PC.

Ok you pushed me that bit more and you Sir trying to put down experience over theory and untested conclusions shows me you are Full of Shit.!! . . . I'll take my Real world experiences using Real world MOTION CONTROL CARDS of all shapes and prices in Real CNC enviroment using most connection types with MACH3 control software (Big Clue here) in a Buffered not realtime windows enviroment over your Theory and untested Conclusions anyday.! . . . Now I'll Jog on.

[Jess]

over your Theory and untested Conclusions anyday.!

You are the one who is making claims about the performance of motion controls you've not tested simply on the basis that you've used other motion controls that happen to have the same connector on them.

[JAZZCNC]

You are the one who is making claims about the performance of motion controls you've not tested simply on the basis that you've used other motion controls that happen to have the same connector on them.

FYI with exception of a few Cheap Chinese rubbish USB controllers not worth the effort I've tested and used all Motion control cards that work with Mach3. Because after all we are talking, or I am, about expereices using Motion control cards working with Mach3 and not about the Protocol used to do this. I don't give a toss if I used a piece of string to Talk to Machine in Klingon so long as it's stable and reliable in use. My Experience with USB and Mach3 hasn't been good or stable regardless of Device Supplier or PC.

Regards the Sieg USB device if that's what your refering to as the " Untested" then Chances are it's using one I've already tested or some variant.
I could with a quick phone call findout exactly what or who's device it uses as one of the main developers of the Sieg machines I know quite well.! . . . . Chances are he is the one doing the support in UK.!

[Jess]

Because after all we are talking, or I am, about expereices using Motion control cards working with Mach3 and not about the Protocol used to do this.

We were both very obviously talking about the connection/protocol. For example; here you are, talking specifically about the protocol used, only a scant few posts ago:

The Same can't be said for USB it's irratic and unpredictable. There's so many things that can affect it IMO it's not a good or suitable connection for reliable Motion control.

Then your very next post; talking about protocol again:

Ethernet is much better than USB for Motion control

My Experience with USB and Mach3 hasn't been good or stable regardless of Device Supplier or PC.

That's fine - that's a claim based on your experience; I'm not trying to argue that you've never used a good or stable one!

However...you're not saying the same thing when your words are about USB as a whole. When you claim that USB is not a 'good or suitable connection for reliable Motion control' you're unavoidably also claiming that it's impossible for a USB motion controller to be reliable, because it uses USB.

[JAZZCNC]

However...you're not saying the same thing when your words are about USB as a whole. When you claim that USB is not a 'good or suitable connection for reliable Motion control' you're unavoidably also claiming that it's impossible for a USB motion controller to be reliable, because it uses USB.

Twist my words to suite for argument all you like the fact still remains with real world experience in a cnc enviroment using MACH3 with All connection types and just about every Motion control card that works with Mach3. USB is definatlely the one thats given me most unexplained troubles. Ethernet hasn't and that's a fact not theory.!! . . . . . Now I really have done with this pointless argument.!!

[Jon.]

Im with jess on this one, usb is far more reliable.

I run both my machines with uc300's from a laptop. it never looses connection, has an excellent 100khz buffer and has been left on for over a week in the past with no issues.

I also have a wired network with multiple routers tried over the years and they all failed from time to time. I know not the same but doesn't give me much faith.

[JAZZCNC]

II run both my machines with uc300's from a laptop. it never looses connection, has an excellent 100khz buffer and has been left on for over a week in the past with no issues.

See this is the point.!! . . . . I've used the uc300 and it was fine. Untill you turned some high frequency device on near by then it would freakout. (In the USS case next Room.!!)
Yes it can be said it's the Cards fault not USB protocol but this doesn't happen with Ethernet driven devices I've used. They handle EMF and such crazyness much better in my experience.
I'm not into communication and all that goes with it. But I am into CNC and all that goes with that and I know thru experience that Ethernet is better than USB when it comes to running a CNC machine using Mach3..!! . . . Which is what started this whole Hang bag stuff in first place.!
It's just some people have to twwist words and things around to suit there own Ego's!!