. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Neil...

    Build log...here

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by njhussey View Post
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Thanks which one are you referring to? Can you do a drawing?

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by njhussey View Post
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Ah I think I get you, in the real design the spindle would be centralized to the gantry, not hanging out the front.

  4. #4
    Yes, that's what I meant
    Neil...

    Build log...here

  5. #5
    Just easier to draw it hanging out the front so you can see where it is

  6. #6
    I may have misread this but the two rails under the bed seem to give total support to the outside edges and none in the centre? As most of the cutting will actually tend towards the centre do you think this is a good idea?
    I have never quite figured out the optimum separation but there must be one

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Robin Hewitt View Post
    I may have misread this but the two rails under the bed seem to give total support to the outside edges and none in the centre? As most of the cutting will actually tend towards the centre do you think this is a good idea?
    I have never quite figured out the optimum separation but there must be one

    Mmm as pictured the bed would be made of 100x100 square hollow section so shouldn't flex too much. However liear rail is cheap so wouldn't hurt to add one in the middle.


    Just doing the numbers, using 100x100x5 shs @ 14.7kg per meter. The traveling 0 shape fixed but moving gantry design reqires 4.2m of tube per 100mm width. So for a 200mm wide traveling 0 it would weigh 120kg, heavy but just managable .


    The very tall normal machine of the same size would need 15m of tube which would weigh 220kg.

  8. #8
    Flex is not the real issue, right now the name of the game is minimising the overhangs -smileyface

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nitrile O-ring belt drive - suggested stretch percentage..?
    By Wal in forum Linear & Rotary Motion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 13-05-2014, 11:49 PM
  2. Domestic ring main wiring
    By mekanik in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-10-2013, 05:50 PM
  3. Simple O-ring calculator.
    By jcb121 in forum General Computing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-07-2013, 09:00 PM
  4. how to measure a ring for cnc.
    By crimsonred in forum Probing, Digitizing & Scaning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-09-2010, 02:47 PM
  5. Scrool jaw ring for hydraulic soft jaws.
    By Pmac in forum Tool & Tooling Technology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-01-2010, 07:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •