. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    it would also be a challenge for the floor boards.

  2. #2
    Indeed indeed, so just brainstorming what my options are now. Thinking the height adjustment on the bed is abit of a hassle I could do without. But I still want to be able to work on tall items. So that leaves me with a very tall machine, would have to use waste boards or something to space the work up, maybe a hassle maybe not. Something like this.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Tall.png 
Views:	1237 
Size:	6.8 KB 
ID:	17148

    I'm wondering if there would be a better way though. I had an idea... it's basically a fixed gantry except the bed is fixed and the gantry moves(not shown but bed would sit on supports at both ends). I think it would look really cool, like some sort of scanner out of a sci-fi movie. Would offer better access aswell and I think I could make it significantly lighter. * not a proper drawing just an artists interpretation * shown with spindle hanging out the front for ease of drawing, obviously it would be a dual gantry with centralized spindle.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alt1.png 
Views:	1178 
Size:	9.6 KB 
ID:	17149Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alt2.png 
Views:	1238 
Size:	4.6 KB 
ID:	17150Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Alt3.png 
Views:	1226 
Size:	8.3 KB 
ID:	17151

    I think both would suffer from strength issues, especially as there is no diagonal support to stop skewing.

    Any thoughts?
    Last edited by Rufe0; 07-01-2016 at 09:52 PM.

  3. #3
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Neil...

    Build log...here

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by njhussey View Post
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Thanks which one are you referring to? Can you do a drawing?

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by njhussey View Post
    Why don't you put the Z axis between the gantry uprights? It would put the C of G much closer to the center of the gantry bearings and you'd lose much less cutting area at the back end of the bed.
    Ah I think I get you, in the real design the spindle would be centralized to the gantry, not hanging out the front.

  6. #6
    Yes, that's what I meant
    Neil...

    Build log...here

  7. #7
    Just easier to draw it hanging out the front so you can see where it is

  8. #8
    I may have misread this but the two rails under the bed seem to give total support to the outside edges and none in the centre? As most of the cutting will actually tend towards the centre do you think this is a good idea?
    I have never quite figured out the optimum separation but there must be one

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Nitrile O-ring belt drive - suggested stretch percentage..?
    By Wal in forum Linear & Rotary Motion
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 13-05-2014, 11:49 PM
  2. Domestic ring main wiring
    By mekanik in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 15-10-2013, 05:50 PM
  3. Simple O-ring calculator.
    By jcb121 in forum General Computing
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 26-07-2013, 09:00 PM
  4. how to measure a ring for cnc.
    By crimsonred in forum Probing, Digitizing & Scaning
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 27-09-2010, 02:47 PM
  5. Scrool jaw ring for hydraulic soft jaws.
    By Pmac in forum Tool & Tooling Technology
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 28-01-2010, 07:55 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •