Looking good. You are going down a tried and trusted route with this design so far so should be ok.

p.s. As I write this it is a cold, dark, rainy morning - jealous of your views and weather!
Thanks mate, I spent 12 months in England many years ago. The people were heaps of fun but I don't miss the constant drizzle and gloom.

I have 2 different ideas in mind. Can people please comment on which they think is better or if I have completely dropped the ball suggest a better design altogether.

Gantry Frame Design 1
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	gantryrough.jpg 
Views:	349 
Size:	29.7 KB 
ID:	16460 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	gantryrough1.jpg 
Views:	331 
Size:	29.5 KB 
ID:	16461
Pros
Seems to be a more conventional design. Maybe better Braced then alternative
Cons
Heavier 23kg
  • Spindle will be slightly in front of leading edge of front gantry y axis linear rail block. Could lengthen gantry from 250mm to 300mm to fix this or could reduce box section from 200x100x4 to 200x50x4 don't really like either option.
  • More chance of warp due to more welding
  • More complex to work with, holes and relief cuts needed to fit necessary components in back of gantry.


Gantry Frame Design 2
Click image for larger version. 

Name:	assembly2.jpg 
Views:	331 
Size:	29.7 KB 
ID:	16462 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	assembly2a.jpg 
Views:	371 
Size:	29.4 KB 
ID:	16463
Pros

  • simpler to build
  • Spindle is within leading edge of linear guide maybe more stable (spindle not drawn just calculated)
  • lighter (20kg) just frame as shown
  • Easier to add componentry to back of gantry

Cons

  • ? Maybe less rigid due to having no back bracing on the gantry.
  • Fixing the 2 y axis linear guides to the back of the gantry will be more difficult


So which broad design do you think is better and why? Also is weight going to be a problem? Maybe another 30 ish kg to add to gantry with steppers, guides, z axis etc. Will 425oz steppers be too weak?
Thanks for any advice given!