. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Rye's Avatar
    Lives in Sheffield, United Kingdom. Last Activity: 16-02-2019 Has been a member for 6-7 years. Has a total post count of 50. Received thanks 4 times, giving thanks to others 0 times.
    Hey transistor, I've only used V-Carve software and my experience with anything beyond that is limited or next to zero. That said, with V-Carve I just export the g-code using a standard or generic profile that's not machine specific: g-code (mm).tap
    Bought a Chinese 6040...if only I'd known better :(

  2. #2
    As Rye suggests, use a fairly basic post-proc and you will probably be fine. Fanuc and some of the more sophisticated controllers are more likely to use their own gcode extensions. Stick to a generic post-proc, like Mach3 or EMC/LinuxCNC, and you will just be generating "standard" gcode (whatever that is!). I would start with something like "Mach3 mm arcs", or "Mach3 mm arcs ATC" if your controller can handle M6 tool change commands and you are using different tools on one job.

  3. #3
    Hi Rye and Neale, many thanks for the replies, I was probably worrying about it un-necessarily.
    I'm still trying to get up to speed on the CAM, so want to keep it simple to minimise my mistakes...
    thanks again, Roger.

  4. #4
    You are probably right to try to keep it simple! I started around 5 years ago and tried to use freeware CAM packages. They might well have improved in that time, but I did find them limited and problematic to use. I did some useful work with them, but was always fighting rather than working with them. I moved to Vectric VCarve and never looked back. It's not cheap, but Vectric have worked hard at making the interface and the options as easy to use as reasonably possible. A lot of people recommend Cambam, but I haven't used it myself. Good luck with Dolphin - again, not one that I have used. The trouble with CAM is that there are usually a lot of options and parameters to tweak, until you eventually figure out the ones that you can ignore and leave as default, while you just change the ones that matter. Good luck!

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Neale View Post
    Fanuc and some of the more sophisticated controllers are more likely to use their own gcode extensions.
    Isn't Mach3 essentially a basic Fanuc controller?

    http://www.machsupport.com/software/...st-processors/

    Scroll down to find that Newfangled solutions recommend a basic Fanuc POST should work if you don't have a CAM specific post processor, this was the case when Art Fennerty still ran the show so it's not just smoke from the slackers who bought him out and broke the product ;-)
    I so bet Art is crying and laughing his socks off at the same time, the Chinese stand alone controllers are giving MACH4 What For and look like being a better bet! :D
    You think that's too expensive? You're not a Model Engineer are you? :D

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. On going chinese 6040 problems
    By amxen in forum Chinese Machines
    Replies: 65
    Last Post: 03-06-2020, 08:46 AM
  2. New 6040 owner looking for advice from others with a chinese 6040/3040
    By itsmillertime in forum Machine Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 14-10-2019, 08:30 AM
  3. Machine better than a chinese 6040 for a beginner?
    By d4cnc in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 09-11-2015, 12:47 PM
  4. Chineese 6040 problems
    By Kendrick57 in forum Gantry/Router Machines & Building
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 18-10-2015, 10:52 PM
  5. my 6040 experience (yeah, and problems) so far
    By jimbo_cnc in forum Machine Discussion
    Replies: 52
    Last Post: 07-10-2014, 11:26 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •