Threaded View
-
21-02-2016 #3
Terry,
wise choice in ditching the parallel port and going with a motion controller. The tb6560 however will still be required should you go with any motion controller as it is a breakout board and a set of stepper motor drivers all in one.
Our, (guys correct me if I am wrong but I am pretty sure) general opinion is that Mach4 is not quite there yet. Mach3 has more going for it in the sense that there are more plugins, screens, wizards and the like and many more users able to give you help.
Warp9TD have a little program that will make the transition to using the smoothstepper easier on their website however I still prefer to do it manually. It is not that difficult.
https://emvioeng.com
Machine tools and 3D printing supplies. Expanding constantly.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Smoothstepper
By Sparks in forum Warp9 (SmoothStepper)Replies: 6Last Post: 05-11-2018, 10:03 AM -
Help mach3 ethernet set up
By kell in forum Artsoft Mach (3 & 4)Replies: 3Last Post: 06-12-2015, 10:26 PM -
Any SmoothStepper UK Resellers?
By Mad Professor in forum Motor Drivers & ControllersReplies: 15Last Post: 12-08-2014, 08:19 AM -
CSMIO/IP-M vs Ethernet SmoothStepper (Begone foul parallel port!)
By Greeny in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 20Last Post: 14-11-2013, 11:59 PM -
To SmoothStepper or not to - that is the question
By bruce_miranda in forum General ElectronicsReplies: 4Last Post: 29-09-2008, 06:31 PM
Bookmarks