Thread: Thor, or should that be Zeus?
Threaded View
-
08-03-2016 #11
The idea is to allow for absorption of vibration etc. The hollows in the base structures improve strength and keep the weight bit more palatable. I need to check what the final weight estimate will be, I have had some issues with the files in Fusion, so redrawing some of the machine.
The idea here too is that this machine could be running a lot quicker (velocity and acceleration) than a Tormach. Considering the cost of a Tormach (ignore shipment / import duties, just the raw buy price), Thor should be a better machine.
The Tormach 1100 specs are below:-
110 IPM is 2800 mm/min. I am aiming for upwards of 10 000mm/min at least. The rails, ballscrews and motors that I am using cost more than the entire Tormach machine if I paid full new price (which I did not). This is before adding the controller, electronics, structure costs, spindle etc.Feed Rate: 110 IPM (X,Y)
90 IPM (Z)
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Bookmarks