. .

View Poll Results: Do you belt drive or direct coupling?

Voters
14. You may not vote on this poll
  • Belt drive

    8 57.14%
  • Direct coupling

    6 42.86%

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    It was done long ago to eliminate vibration when drives were crappy. Now drives are digital so that will not matter so much. Now is done for the sake of hiding the motor, gearing it and so on. And yeah, for the sake of alignment and simplicity, as 2 things bolted to the same plate/plane is easier to align than 2 thing bolted on a same axis.

    Anyway i don't like spring couplings and having in mind the cheap price of ball screw mounts, i would always use both sides angular contact bearings. The so called rigid mounting, or scenario D.

    At the end of the day machines look more tidy and all is more rigid when you don't see the motors. Protruding motors will need a good mount, not just 4 bolts and spacers, so its up to you.
    project 1 , 2, Dust Shoe ...

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Boyan Silyavski For This Useful Post:


  3. #2
    I agree with the above. My current machine uses
    1:1 belt drive on Z (to hide the motor)
    Direct drive on Y through spring coupler (although I had plans for belt drive to hide the motor, but never implemented them)
    Direct drive on X and A through spring couplers

    My comments:
    Choice of which to use on DIY machines is mainly to hide motors, mounting simplicity, and if you want options to gear the drive train up/down
    Not noticed errors due to belt play or stretch so don't think that is a factor on DIY machines (commercial machines I've seen are all direct drive though)
    Have had those spring couplers break (I don't think they are a good idea on a cnc machine), and next machine will use 'oldham style' couplers which look more robust (although cost a little more)
    Building a CNC machine to make a better one since 2010 . . .
    MK1 (1st photo), MK2, MK3, MK4

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to routercnc For This Useful Post:


  5. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Boyan Silyavski View Post
    It was done long ago to eliminate vibration when drives were crappy. Now drives are digital so that will not matter so much. Now is done for the sake of hiding the motor, gearing it and so on. And yeah, for the sake of alignment and simplicity, as 2 things bolted to the same plate/plane is easier to align than 2 thing bolted on a same axis.

    Anyway i don't like spring couplings and having in mind the cheap price of ball screw mounts, i would always use both sides angular contact bearings. The so called rigid mounting, or scenario D.

    At the end of the day machines look more tidy and all is more rigid when you don't see the motors. Protruding motors will need a good mount, not just 4 bolts and spacers, so its up to you.

    Angular bearings on both sides!? Am I misunderstanding what you said here and you actually mean one set of back to back angular bearings on one end and a floating bearing on the other or are you actually suggesting angular contacts on both ends (fixed/fixed)?

    I don't personally think fixed/fixed is a good idea in general unless you really need that increase in critical speed, but especially so on machines built from aluminium extrusion like Desert's due to the difference in thermal expansion between steel and aluminium.

    Re the topic, If you use proper high torque belts (bearing boys is a good source of HTD belts) then slip is a non issue. Theoretically you might have a bit less accuracy due to belt flex and a teeny tiny extra backlash but in reality I don't think it's an issue on a hobby level machine... they are pretty much backlash free and the re-inforcement strands mean that flex is very minimal.

    Personally for me I prefer direct with decent couplings, but it's really just a question of what better suits your machine design I think.
    Last edited by Zeeflyboy; 29-08-2017 at 05:28 PM.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Zeeflyboy For This Useful Post:


  7. #4
    My machine has fixed to fixed on all axis and generally having in mind the low price of the bearings i am even doing my foam cutter like that. The only problem with that arrangement that you will ever encounter is if something is not well aligned. I am milling up to steel with my router, so excuse me if i do not trust a fixed/floating arrangement. Plus FYI Chinese sell the many times the BK and other mounts with deep groove bearings, not angular. Sometimes you will have to specifically specify that you like to have angular bearings. Its in the small letters usually if you pay attention. Hence that's why i don't change providers if i can help it.

    Buy HTD pulleys from reputable sellers only or you will have a box of faulty pulleys, like the one i have.
    project 1 , 2, Dust Shoe ...

  8. The Following User Says Thank You to Boyan Silyavski For This Useful Post:


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. idea for linear belt drive
    By dickieto in forum Rails, Guideways & Bearings
    Replies: 36
    Last Post: 28-02-2021, 05:33 PM
  2. Belt drive on a router
    By John S in forum Rails, Guideways & Bearings
    Replies: 23
    Last Post: 10-09-2012, 09:39 PM
  3. WANTED: wanted drive belt and pulleys
    By oadamo in forum Items Wanted
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 13-05-2011, 09:00 PM
  4. any one know where to get a belt drive convertion for x2
    By Scott in forum Sieg Milling Machines
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 27-09-2010, 08:44 PM
  5. Belt drive and pulley sizes
    By j2sip in forum Belt Drive, Pulleys & Timing
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 20-06-2010, 10:44 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •