. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Quote Originally Posted by Neale View Post
    Or just build your spreadsheet to generate one G2 per vertical step, and calculate away! I'm sure that that will work. But my IT background says that if a machine can do the work for me, then I'm not going to spend brain cycles doing it by hand...

    Good luck either way.
    I was pondering along these lines as well, a good excuse to swot up on exactly how G2 and G3 instructions work and whether Excel will export files delimited with cariage returns. The arc centres are all the same and the end points progress outward in symetrical straight lines so it should not be too dificult. If the angles match then using a V-bit will help smooth the edges but that would only be possible for very short cones with most V-bits.

    You're not going into competition with OMLCNC are you? http://www.mycncuk.com/threads/14408...632#post123632

    Kit
    An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitwn View Post

    You're not going into competition with OMLCNC are you? http://www.mycncuk.com/threads/14408...632#post123632

    No :-) my cones are only going to be 2...3cm tall and made of 7075 ali

    Kit

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by Kitwn View Post
    I was pondering along these lines as well, a good excuse to swot up on exactly how G2 and G3 instructions work and whether Excel will export files delimited with cariage returns. The arc centres are all the same and the end points progress outward in symetrical straight lines so it should not be too dificult. If the angles match then using a V-bit will help smooth the edges but that would only be possible for very short cones with most V-bits.

    Kit
    Did a bit more thinking about this and to get a smooth toolpath the arc centres aren't the same, you need to offset them ever so slightly to get the arc ends to join up and get the best approximation - as Neale pointed out, on a true spiral the radius is continually increasing, hence if you divide the circumference into a small-ish number of sections with the same centre there would be a slight bump in-between sections. In the end for prototyping I took the crude but simple approach, slicing the model to create a number of 2D toolpaths which I outputted together. Wasn't as much work as I thought thanks to the speediness of Generic CADD (actually took less time than I'd spent playing around with the maths of an elegant solution!), and has ended up greatly reducing the machining time as I've been able to include the flutes which I was going to cut into the cone as a separate operation. The 303 stainless cuts nicely on my little machine using blue-nano coated cutters, only running at 800mm/min at the mo but from the noise it feels like it could go a fair bit faster - but I'll leave pushing the limits until the development work is done!

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Voicecoil View Post
    Did a bit more thinking about this and to get a smooth toolpath the arc centres aren't the same, you need to offset them ever so slightly to get the arc ends to join up and get the best approximation - as Neale pointed out, on a true spiral the radius is continually increasing, hence if you divide the circumference into a small-ish number of sections with the same centre there would be a slight bump in-between sections. In the end for prototyping I took the crude but simple approach, slicing the model to create a number of 2D toolpaths which I outputted together. Wasn't as much work as I thought thanks to the speediness of Generic CADD (actually took less time than I'd spent playing around with the maths of an elegant solution!), and has ended up greatly reducing the machining time as I've been able to include the flutes which I was going to cut into the cone as a separate operation. The 303 stainless cuts nicely on my little machine using blue-nano coated cutters, only running at 800mm/min at the mo but from the noise it feels like it could go a fair bit faster - but I'll leave pushing the limits until the development work is done!
    I was thinking in terms of a series of 2D cuts rather than a true spiral. The maths would be a lot simpler, though I can see the desire for the best surface finish straight off the machine when you're cutting stainless. Not quite as easy to sand afterwards as hardwood!

    Kit
    An optimist says the glass is half full, a pessimist says the glass is half empty, an engineer says you're using the wrong sized glass.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Vector Aspire problem - drill toolpath converted to pocket toolpath
    By pablocordal in forum CAD & CAM Software
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 31-10-2018, 02:26 PM
  2. Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-05-2018, 02:05 AM
  3. Feeds and speeds settings for compression spiral
    By Metal pecker in forum General Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 02-07-2016, 06:41 PM
  4. Long Down Cut Spiral End Mills
    By Bazzer in forum Marketplace Discussion
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 23-12-2013, 06:11 PM
  5. Wealden Tools enlarge range of spiral router cutters
    By Routers in forum Manufacturer News
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 01-07-2011, 12:42 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •