I want to DIY.. some questions please!

[Tenson]

No... in series it's 6.2A and in parallel 12.4A.

Hmm, surely the parallel connection will draw twice the current of a single winding, not twice that of the series connections. Similarly the series connection will draw half the current of a single winding, not half that of a parallel set-up.

Not at all - how strong you make the gantry with a single screw is largely irrelevant with regards to racking....
To rotate (rack), the rails do not have to deflect much at all...
This happens with almost every build log - starts off thinking one ballscrew will be fine, then by about page 3 we manage to persuade that it's not.

Lol, okay I get it :tup: I'll go for two ball-screws.

I still wonder though; why isn't it better to use the same screw pitch for all axis, so that providing the motors don't run out of torque, each axis will have the same speed and resolution?

I really don't want to go the rotating ball-nut route, nor linking the ball-screws with a belt. Going with dual ball-screw I'd like to use two motors. I'll bear the tedious tuning procedure when I first get it up and running. At least I know to expect that now thanks to you guys!

Think what happens if one motor has a slightly different load.. then stalls.

My question was really about why it is better to power each motor and ball-screw from a separate drive circuit, rather than just using both motors from one circuit. The motors can surely still individually stall, even with two driving circuits.

[Jonathan]

Hmm, surely the parallel connection will draw twice the current of a single winding, not twice that of the series connections. Similarly the series connection will draw half the current of a single winding, not half that of a parallel set-up.

In parallel the current is twice the current for one winding. In series it is the same as the current for one winding as you have the same current flowing through both.
GCSE Physics...

I still wonder though; why isn't it better to use the same screw pitch for all axis, so that providing the motors don't run out of torque, each axis will have the same speed and resolution?

Each axis has a different mass and length of ballscrew, both of which affect the feedrate. So the same screw pitch on both will result in different speeds since other variables are still different. The resolution will be the same.

Your Y-axis is 600mm (?), so I'd still go for 10mm pitch on Y.

I really don't want to go the rotating ball-nut route

Why?

My question was really about why it is better to power each motor and ball-screw from a separate drive circuit, rather than just using both motors from one circuit. The motors can surely still individually stall, even with two driving circuits.

Same answer, but to put it bluntly if one steppers stalls when you have two on one driver then you can say goodbye to the driver. If one stalls with two drivers it's a bit annoying as the gantry is bent, but not the end of the world.

[JAZZCNC]

Tenson Jonathan's right on all counts here. I gave you the options he's giving you specifics about the rotating nut. If your wise you'll go with the rotating nuts at this length for best speeds verse's cost's.
The rotating nut will give you best of both worlds and save you some money.

The other reason for not using 1 drive with 2 motors is that if the pulse timing doesn't get to each motor at exactly the same time then you will slowly drift either infront or behind on 1 axis so all in all it's a lose lose situation and at best you'll be inaccurate and worst be letting out the magic smoke. . . Your choice.!!