Threaded View
-
08-06-2015 #18
I suspect that the underlying UDP ethernet protocol is nearly as error prone as the USB protocol, however, the TCP/IP layer which sits above it and does the error correction is (as has been pointed out) extremely robust so the end result is much better.
I can see both sides of the argument but theory is worth nothing if it doesn't work in practise...
For what it's worth, I've got a 3D printer which is extremely noise sensitive on the USB connection (to the point I now download the print to a memory card and print from that) and a USB CNC controller which I haven't had a problem with but there are dire warnings on the website about using a good quality cable - see https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NUu9xwDfJ9k
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
USB/Ethernet controller for Mach3/4 advice
By paulus.v in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 17Last Post: 17-02-2015, 09:37 PM -
CSMIO/IP-M vs Ethernet SmoothStepper (Begone foul parallel port!)
By Greeny in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 20Last Post: 14-11-2013, 11:59 PM -
USB and Ethernet Mach3 motion controller PLCM-E3
By Purelogic R&D in forum Manufacturer NewsReplies: 39Last Post: 29-12-2012, 09:38 AM -
Pros and cons of climb milling in wood
By Richie in forum Wood Finishing Tips & TricksReplies: 15Last Post: 14-06-2012, 05:09 PM -
Types of Ballnut and preload, questions - pros & cons ?
By Jon S in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & SupportsReplies: 1Last Post: 16-01-2012, 03:39 PM
Bookmarks