Hybrid View
-
10-04-2023 #1
Hi Kelly welcome to the forum, this is exactly why you should share/start a build log, your design doesn't have to be novel but it will be interesting to allot of us, we can focus on the construction aspects together and maybe learn from each other too :)
Are you building a moving gantry type machine or mill?
MACHINES
Discussion related to machines, working with them and building your own..Me
-
11-04-2023 #2
Gantry. Considered Moving and Fixed Gantry, and Moving Table, but moving gantry seemed to best fit my goals.
I'll see what I can do but am pretty far along. The Z is built. Most of the linear motion components are in hand or on order and design fairly well committed. Motors, drives, machine controller not yet committed but fairly far along yet I must confess, still learning.and plenty of room for learning and input there. Here's teaser on the Z.
Best,
KellyLast edited by Tool-n-Around; 11-04-2023 at 02:13 PM.
-
13-04-2023 #3
I always use belt reductions to get 5um per half step, tuck the motors out of the way and keep the hand wheels. I round every movement out to 0.005mm. Works for me.
Thing is my latest mill conversion has steppers and DRO's. Not a problem unless the stepper controller can read the DRO's. I couldn't resist...
What will I have it do when the motor disagrees with the DRO by >0.01?
-
12-05-2025 #4
I use similar figures with a lathe cross slide—5um per full step and 2.5um per half step to give 5um on diameter. I found that measuring with a 1/10 thou dial gauge (all I had that accurate) showed that a conventional stepper would give inconsistent half steps. I changed the stepper and controller to one with a 1000-count encoder, and the problem was solved. Incidentally, the drive is much quieter and smoother, and the controller is smaller and does not need fan cooling.
I'm a convert to feedback steppers but is it worth changing them on my Bridgeport?
-
12-05-2025 #5
The issue with microstepping, is that you're essentially relying on the energised coils to balance the rotor between steps, so any external forces can affect the actual position.
The reduced noise is down to a combination of modern drives switching above audible frequencies, and producing a more sine like output, so you don't the noticeable step pulses. Even if you run them in single step mode, they'll still likely be outputting a more sine like wave form, rather than the old stepper drivers, that simply stepped between voltages.
As for your Bridgeport, does it work well enough for you as it is?
Personally, for a Bridgeport if I was going to change the motors, I'd go for proper servos, as they'll still outperform any comparably sized closed loop stepper if geared properly.Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.
-
The Following User Says Thank You to m_c For This Useful Post:
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Similar Threads
-
Belt Drives for AMA16VF/ BF16 and others
By Mark @ HMSNZ in forum Manufacturer NewsReplies: 0Last Post: 25-02-2015, 11:44 PM -
Drives without steppers
By Wobblycogs in forum Gantry/Router Machines & BuildingReplies: 5Last Post: 27-03-2014, 01:07 PM -
FOR SALE: Various Steppers, servos, drives for sale
By Peter. in forum Items For SaleReplies: 2Last Post: 02-02-2014, 09:56 PM -
FOR SALE: Steppers (3), Drives (3), Breakout board and 500w 48v PSU
By deannos in forum Items For SaleReplies: 13Last Post: 11-10-2012, 10:44 AM -
FOR SALE: Steppers (3), Drives (3), Breakout board and 500w 48v PSU
By carl0s in forum Items For SaleReplies: 6Last Post: 30-05-2011, 01:03 AM
Bookmarks