. .

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Yes, the VFD will be used in sensorless vector mode which is not as good as the closed loop type but is still better than a standard scalar frequency mode but like I say make sure the VFD can work in vector mode with your spindle.
    Last edited by EddyCurrent; 26-12-2013 at 09:47 PM.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by EddyCurrent View Post
    Yes, the VFD will be used in sensorless vector mode which is not as good as the closed loop type but is still better than a standard scalar frequency mode
    Hi, this is new to me, have had a look on wiki, i get the basics. but not enough to understand.

    I want to cut from Foam to stone, using a few different spindles if required. So

    1. Does using sensor less vector mode give better toque at lower revs, on a standard setup.
    2. Is this enough of a difference to be usfull ?

    I clearly dont know what i need to know with this, so fire away with any info

    Bart - i am designing/building a similar machine, hop you dont mind me jumping in and asking a question on your post

  3. #3
    Quote Originally Posted by george uk View Post
    1. Does using sensor less vector mode give better toque at lower revs, on a standard setup.
    Yes.

    Quote Originally Posted by george uk View Post
    2. Is this enough of a difference to be usfull ?
    That's a much better question! It depends what you're trying to cut. If you're trying to drill aluminium with HSS drill bits, or mill steel with standard (i.e. no special coatings) carbide cutters (i.e. anything that needs higher torque at low speed0, then the difference will be tangible, but that doesn't mean you can't get away with a cheap V/f control drive. If you're just milling aluminium and cutting wood/plastic etc, then you wont really gain anything.

    Quote Originally Posted by EddyCurrent View Post
    Yes, the VFD will be used in sensorless vector mode which is not as good as the closed loop type
    Sensorless vector control is still closed loop - you're just inferring the rotor position electronically (i.e. from the back-emf) instead of from using an encoder. That indicates the situation where sensorless control isn't as good - it relies on the back-emf which is hard to sense at low speeds, so it's necessary to have field oriented control with an encoder if you need full torque down to zero speed.

    If the limiting factor is the difference in torque between the control algorithms, you should probably look into getting a bigger (e.g. 3kW) spindle and stick with the cheap VFD.
    Old router build log here. New router build log here. Lathe build log here.
    Electric motorbike project here.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. NEW MEMBER: new member building a cnc router
    By steeplejack in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 11-10-2017, 05:07 AM
  2. Help on building an enclosure
    By thomashomer1986 in forum General Electronics
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 02-02-2014, 06:38 PM
  3. NEW MEMBER: CNC and other Machine Building Berlin
    By Andikid in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-10-2010, 11:30 PM
  4. NEW MEMBER: Started building!
    By bobgrant in forum New Member Introductions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 02-09-2010, 09:42 AM
  5. BUILD LOG: Building a mechmate here in the u.k
    By kingfisher in forum DIY Router Build Logs
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 30-01-2010, 02:13 AM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •