Threaded View
-
07-06-2015 #21
In the original context of this thread, which was to do with computer to machine controller interfaces, magicniner's claim is correct.
In the case of CS-Labs they use it for inter-module communication, which is where it excels.
CANbus is a very resilient system, and can be very fast, however nobody uses it as a communication method between a computer and CNC machine. You could use it for realtime operation if you designed a suitable internal slot card that the computer could access directly and control in realtime, but you're then into a very glorified parallel port like system.Avoiding the rubbish customer service from AluminiumWarehouse since July '13.
Thread Information
Users Browsing this Thread
There are currently 10 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 10 guests)
Similar Threads
-
USB/Ethernet controller for Mach3/4 advice
By paulus.v in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 17Last Post: 17-02-2015, 09:37 PM -
CSMIO/IP-M vs Ethernet SmoothStepper (Begone foul parallel port!)
By Greeny in forum Control Hardware & SystemsReplies: 20Last Post: 14-11-2013, 11:59 PM -
USB and Ethernet Mach3 motion controller PLCM-E3
By Purelogic R&D in forum Manufacturer NewsReplies: 39Last Post: 29-12-2012, 09:38 AM -
Pros and cons of climb milling in wood
By Richie in forum Wood Finishing Tips & TricksReplies: 15Last Post: 14-06-2012, 05:09 PM -
Types of Ballnut and preload, questions - pros & cons ?
By Jon S in forum Lead Screws, Nuts & SupportsReplies: 1Last Post: 16-01-2012, 03:39 PM
Bookmarks