. .
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. Yes. The originally spec'd relays (Rapid 60-1310) were fine for both positions.. I would socket mount them.

    The RS699-6869 is overkill with the inbuild LED etc.

    The RS619-3013 would be fine for Relay 2, but as a PCB mounted device its hard to use.

    If price is critical then consider using Rapid 60-1667 in sockets. While these are only rated at 240vAC/5A and 600VA for the switching rate you will use them for they'll be fine and if you're paranoid you could wire the contacts in pairs.

  2. #2
    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    Yes. The originally spec'd relays (Rapid 60-1310) were fine for both positions.. I would socket mount them.
    I'm glad to hear it, as keeping everything to one supplier makes life easier for me. However, I only found reference to it supporting DC coil, not DC contact, which is why I went looking elsewhere.

    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    The RS699-6869 is overkill with the inbuild LED etc.
    True, but the lower end ones are out of stock until January. I'm not bothered by LEDs and test buttons as I don't anticipate seeing it once the cover is closed! As the Rapid version is fine then it's a problem solved (or at least avoided) for today.

    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    The RS619-3013 would be fine for Relay 2, but as a PCB mounted device its hard to use.
    Fair enough. At this stage I'm keenly aware of wiring convenience.

    Quote Originally Posted by irving2008 View Post
    If price is critical then consider using Rapid 60-1667 in sockets. While these are only rated at 240vAC/5A and 600VA for the switching rate you will use them for they'll be fine and if you're paranoid you could wire the contacts in pairs.
    Price is critical over all. I don't want to cut corners but I lack the experience to know which corners can be rounded gently and which can be no more than gently tickled with a chamois cloth.

  3. #3
    Never being one to rush things, I've now got a toroidal transformer sitting on the bench ready to get wired up!

    Specifically, this: Toroidal Transformer 625va 0-50v 0-50v --- link to Data Sheet PDF

    I understand from the Data Sheet that:
    • on the Primary side, I want to wire the Grey and Violet wires together, thereby wiring it in series to handle 230Vac from UK mains,
    • the Blue wire is now 0V and the Brown wire is now 230Vac, then
    • on the Secondary side, I want to wire the Orange and Black together, then the Yellow and Red together, and
    • the Orange/Black is now 0V and the Yellow/Red is now 50Vac.


    Wiring it in parallel will give me 50Vac @ 12.5A.
    After being rectified this will give me 70V @ 12.5A (less voltage drop across the bridge rectifier)

    Is anyone happy to cast their eye over the datasheet and confirm that I'm connecting up the right wires before this goes anywhere near the mains? The instructions look straightforward, but I've said that about lots of things that later went horribly wrong

    The original drivers I was looking at from Zapp are now discontinued. The alternative (DM856) has a max supply voltage of +80, which I understand to be a comfortable margin for this PSU. The closest driver current options, however, are slightly different - 3.8A or 4.3A, whereas my steppers are 4.2A. The old PM752's would provide 4.02A as the closest fit. Is there a significant enough difference in the current provided that would make it worthwhile hunting for different drivers, or is 3.8A fine? These will now be driving an X2, which I'll be using as a stepping stone to my initial DIY design.

    The good news is that I should be finished by 2016, possibly late 2015 if I pull my finger out...

  4. #4
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue View Post
    The original drivers I was looking at from Zapp are now discontinued. The alternative (DM856) has a max supply voltage of +80, which I understand to be a comfortable margin for this PSU. The closest driver current options, however, are slightly different - 3.8A or 4.3A, whereas my steppers are 4.2A. The old PM752's would provide 4.02A as the closest fit. Is there a significant enough difference in the current provided that would make it worthwhile hunting for different drivers, or is 3.8A fine? These will now be driving an X2, which I'll be using as a stepping stone to my initial DIY design.
    Spend little more and Get the AM882 with lead and you can program them to exact amps and much more, they are great drives.

  5. #5
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue
    Wiring it in parallel will give me 50Vac @ 12.5A.
    After being rectified this will give me 70V @ 12.5A (less voltage drop across the bridge rectifier)

    ..
    A small problem with wiring the secondary in parallel is that if the amount of turns on them is not exactly the same the transformer is not as efficient.
    I got around this by rectifying the two windings separately then combining them at the DC side.
    Just a thought. ..Clive
    Last edited by Jonathan; 15-08-2013 at 10:25 PM. Reason: Fixed quote formatting

  6. #6
    Quote Originally Posted by JAZZCNC View Post
    Spend little more and Get the AM882 with lead and you can program them to exact amps and much more, they are great drives.
    Intriguing. I've seen a bit posted about the AM882 drivers but a lot of it didn't seem positive. On some further reading, most of the issues seem to be down to user error and misconfiguration. The price difference at this stage is minimal as well.

    Is it better to match up the driver output with the motor rating exactly, or leave a bit of a margin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Clive S View Post
    A small problem with wiring the secondary in parallel is that if the amount of turns on them is not exactly the same the transformer is not as efficient.
    I got around this by rectifying the two windings separately then combining them at the DC side.
    Just a thought. ..Clive
    Also intriguing, though how would you establish that? Would it be as straightforward as checking the voltage from each output separately? I suspect I will take the easy way out and just use the one rectifier, but I'm intrigued by the idea.
    Last edited by Rogue; 15-08-2013 at 10:14 PM.

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue
    Also intriguing, though how would you establish that? Would it be as straightforward as checking the voltage from each output separately? I suspect I will take the easy way out and just use the one rectifier, but I'm intrigued by the idea.
    I have just joined the two outputs from the caps together with no problems at all. ..Clive
    Last edited by Jonathan; 15-08-2013 at 10:25 PM. Reason: Fixed quote formatting

  8. #8
    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue View Post
    Is it better to match up the driver output with the motor rating exactly, or leave a bit of a margin?
    In theory you should be safe to run any driver up to its rating, since that's the whole point of a rating, if you can trust it. In reality however it's always best to overrate the drivers if you can, since then they will run at a lower temperature which prolongs the life of the components.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue View Post
    Also intriguing, though how would you establish that? Would it be as straightforward as checking the voltage from each output separately?
    Yes - the difficult bit is determining how much of a mismatch would pose a problem.
    Last edited by Jonathan; 15-08-2013 at 10:23 PM.
    Old router build log here. New router build log here. Lathe build log here.
    Electric motorbike project here.

  9. #9
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    In theory you should be safe to run any driver up to its rating, since that's the whole point of a rating, if you can trust it. In reality however it's always best to overrate the drivers if you can, since then they will run at a lower temperature which prolongs the life of the components.
    Hi Jonathan, thanks for chipping in again. I'm still aiming to finish this before you finish at Uni so I'll need you to work towards a PhD, should give me enough time.

    I was thinking about this from the point of view of the stepper motors (4.2A) rather than the drivers. Either of the two drivers discussed are rated higher than the stepper (up to 5.2A for the DM856, up to 8.2A for the AM882) so there is plenty of margin. My question was whether it's better to run the steppers at their max or give them a bit of a margin. If your answer still applies (which logic suggests it does) then it seems reasonable to set the drivers for a little under 4.2A.

  10. #10
    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan View Post
    In short it's extremely unlikely for the windings to be mismatched enough for either method to cause problems, so although I'd advise buying a transformer rated for half the voltage so you can put the secondarys in series, if you find one for the right price which has to be wired in parallel I wouldn't worry.
    Agree here and I've built both ways and never seen any difference to machine which is what matters at end of day. I buy what's cheapest or available and don't care which.

    Quote Originally Posted by Rogue View Post
    Intriguing. I've seen a bit posted about the AM882 drivers but a lot of it didn't seem positive. On some further reading, most of the issues seem to be down to user error and misconfiguration. The price difference at this stage is minimal as well.

    Is it better to match up the driver output with the motor rating exactly, or leave a bit of a margin?
    Yes there have been but that's mostly been because they have little experience or never used digital drives before but trust me they are fantastic drives and give super smooth performance with great resonance handling. The Fact you can configure them thru software helps if you have problems with resonance or just want to get the best performance you can.

    Yes it's always better to match current to motor ratings but not go higher. The only margin you want to leave is on the voltage but it's also always better if the drives are not max'd out on current IE max current setting = motor current so the drives not working flat out.!
    Last edited by JAZZCNC; 15-08-2013 at 10:32 PM.

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Denford Triac VMC year 2000 motors spec
    By suesi34e in forum Milling Machines, Builds & Conversions
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 17-11-2013, 11:44 PM
  2. Advice on spindle inverter spec
    By badgerman in forum Spindles & Drive Motors
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 15-09-2013, 09:26 PM
  3. Hiwin linear blocks HGW 20 CC - what preload to spec?
    By range3rrr in forum Rails, Guideways & Bearings
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 24-08-2011, 11:44 PM
  4. FOR SALE: Servo Spec gearbox's ---- Any offer considered
    By Jimmybristol in forum Items For Sale
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 30-05-2011, 11:04 PM
  5. System spec and Mach3
    By gorbo in forum Computer Hardware
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 23-01-2011, 03:25 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •